kjatexas
'52ReissueTelecaster&Moi
This is the third Fender Telecaster I have owned. The first was a 1960's vintage, bought new, that was stolen along with my Fender Concert Amp. How I miss that amp. The second Tele, was a 1957, that I bought used, in the '70s, for $175. Why did I ever sell that guitar....doh!!!
Update 2/27/2012: I purchased a used '59 Reissue Fender Bassman Amp in excellent condition. The Tele sounds great through that amp. A great replacement for the stolen Concert Amp, both have four 10 inch speakers.
Lighting: Small strobe bank left as main light, background light on seamless paper backdrop, light bounced off white wall behind camera for fill. All strobe heads 200WS. Camera f19 @ 180th sec.
7/5/2012: Replaced original image after reworking brightness/contrast in photoshop. I am continually disappointed that I cannot seem to get the contrast I want in my images, shooting digitally, without resorting to photoshop. I have never had that problem shooting film. I was dissatisfied with the flatness of the original image I posted, and the way it looked on my Mac. While digital is certainly convenient, it has its negatives. I have also noticed that what looks good on my Mac, may or may not look good when viewed on a PC.
'52ReissueTelecaster&Moi
This is the third Fender Telecaster I have owned. The first was a 1960's vintage, bought new, that was stolen along with my Fender Concert Amp. How I miss that amp. The second Tele, was a 1957, that I bought used, in the '70s, for $175. Why did I ever sell that guitar....doh!!!
Update 2/27/2012: I purchased a used '59 Reissue Fender Bassman Amp in excellent condition. The Tele sounds great through that amp. A great replacement for the stolen Concert Amp, both have four 10 inch speakers.
Lighting: Small strobe bank left as main light, background light on seamless paper backdrop, light bounced off white wall behind camera for fill. All strobe heads 200WS. Camera f19 @ 180th sec.
7/5/2012: Replaced original image after reworking brightness/contrast in photoshop. I am continually disappointed that I cannot seem to get the contrast I want in my images, shooting digitally, without resorting to photoshop. I have never had that problem shooting film. I was dissatisfied with the flatness of the original image I posted, and the way it looked on my Mac. While digital is certainly convenient, it has its negatives. I have also noticed that what looks good on my Mac, may or may not look good when viewed on a PC.