View allAll Photos Tagged logical
Hicks, Stephen R.C. & David Kelley (eds) READINGS FOR LOGICAL ANALYSIS: Second Edition, Norton, 5th, (previous edition published as The Art of Reasoning; ideal supplement for courses in logic or critical thinking)
Urbex Benelux -
Brick was a logical alternative in the Netherlands because clay was sufficiently available along the major rivers and other waterways and wood and natural stone were scarce. The well-known Dutch brick architecture developed from this. With population growth and the Industrial Revolution , the demand for stone boomed in the mid-19th century; between 1850 and 1880 the number of brick factories grew from 469 to 881. Often these were only small companies. After 1880, however, demand in the Netherlands decreased as a result of the economic downturn and, moreover, foreign competition increased, after which the factories began to organize themselves.
§ Angkor Vat is intentionally a perceptual phenomenon—beyond query of assembling, upon temporal and logical structuring • It purposes to propel us the obedience in law of the Universe (rta) which infers the endless cycle of karma and dharma • The harmonious achievement of its axiality and centrality leads us to experience the order of our spiritual space in notion of time which is both objectivity (measurable) and subjectivity (beyond-mensurable) in terms of physical and psychological aspect • The I–time denotes the experiences of egocentric self in an associated order of serial events according to the criteria of ‘earlier’ and ‘later’ in our faculty • Conception of contradictions between the transcendental and the immanent, the absolute and the relative, the eternal and the temporal, the empirical and the rational in time has an immense affect to the application of our aesthetic experience (rasa) and continuance (bhava) in architecture • Science and philosophy are concordant about perception of time by its relativity and perennity • Time (kala) is an attribute of form (akara) and space (akasa) • The relativity of the four-dimensional space-time continuum is simply ‘existed’ on the reels of our consciousness by encompassment of our inconceivable intellect •
§ The replicating rise and fall of Sun (Surya—the solar deity) in each symmetric punctuation of time enforce us to be aware of the rhythm of our existing world in both the positive and the negative aspect of time • It is a form of psychological references that some associations—involving the patterns of temporal alternation which are recorded in our experience—can emotionally affected by the art of architecture • Rhythm and emotion which colligated to it attest that the intuition of aesthetic judgement will be instinctively established whenever beholders are expected to recognise it or not • Angkor Vat is therefore inextricably adhered to the materialistic contingencies in space and absolved from the uncongeniality in time • We are embraced in context of eternity where the visual art of architecture (vastu) enforces us the synthetic negation to the absolute nature of space and time •
Glitch pic of Logical Fiend show HNW @Bruitime festval TOTEM
original by PG.
follow this link for all the set: www.flickr.com/photos/99890962@N04/sets/72157634966151672/
more glitch art: glitch-art.tumblr.com
by jwcurry. Vancouver, Curvd H&z, 31 march 1979. 3o copies issued as Curvd H&z [series o] #9 & Th Wrecking Ballzark [series o] #1 in 2 variants:
a) 25 trade copies as described below
b) 5 copies #d & signed in black & blue ballpoint with a holograph version of logical sequence o added to back cover.
4 x 5-3/4, 2 sheets white deckletone folded unbound to 8 pp in nested selfwrappers, all printed black rubberstamp.
includes collaborations with Dave Beach & Peggy Lefler.
Logical Guitars THE GHOST
Vancouver Canada
阿佐ヶ谷の素敵なギター・ショップ
Last Guitar さんで
購って参りました(^_-)
とんでもなくやり過ぎなかんじ
唯一無二の存在感(^_-)
いや透明感？
微妙にご縁のある Last Guitar さんの
Web で観て
とても気になってしまった
ギターなのです
もちろんそのままでも
充分かっっこいいギターだけど
好みのトーン目指して
ちょっと手を加えました。
6. 5点のピック・アップ・セレクターは
動きを固めにするため
たまたま落ちてた別なのに変更
ノブの部分は銀色に変更ですぞ
7.リア・ピックアップをonにするスイッチ
これで、リアとフロントのmixや
三つのピックアップ全部のmixが可能に(^_-)♬
8.細部も可能な限り透明にしたかった((((；ﾟДﾟ)))))))..............
9.だってこの緑のタイプはリアはハムバッカーだった
だからエスカッションをアクリルの板で作ったけど
これはこれで透明感あってかえってよい雰囲気かな
思いましたぞ
10.12.は落ちていたSeymour Duncanのピックアップ
たしかnoiseがのりすぎのような気がして
使わなくなってほおっておいたピックアップなんだけど
まあまた日の目を視る日が来たということだろうか
使ってみよう。
11.はよくわからんけどなんだか良い感じの音ピックアップ
昔よくつかっていたギターにのってた物
なんかの時に交換してとってあったのだ
Stratocasterタイプの場合
とにかく
Low gainでウルトラ・クリーンが好みですので...
そうゆう感じで
出来ました 出来ました
なんか凄い 説明的なこと書きましたぞ(^_-)♬
ねむい
クラシック・ギターから入った私は
やっぱりガット・ギター派で
最近はあんまりエレクトリック・ギター
弾く機会ないのだけど
でも どうしよう
なんかに 使いたいけどナ
Importance of Logical reasoning in every student life is recognised earlier by Mydearstudent website. All Logical reasoning topics will be addressed effectively by the skilled teachers in Mydearstudent. Logical reasoning and Aptitude are the main fields in any competitive exam, so one should practice more. No doubt Mydearstudent is a nice platform to practice Logical reasoning effectively by the students.
(Enhanced version - logical filter only)
This photo captures some interesting phenomana. On the left I see Mother Mary praying, next to her a small dove. Next i see Jesus laying dead on his back.(the cloud drift represents him being torn between the physical world on the left and heaven on the right) In the top right hand corner are two angels looking down on Jesus's body from heaven.
This is a sharper shot than what was recently posted, These photo's all come of of films and color and lighting are used for enhancement. For a cloud formation to create this image one would have to consider what kind of force's are at work here. The supernatural at its finest and messages from probably above. There will never be a logical explanation for the skyimages and science won't even go there.
Looking down the stairwell in the National Museum of Scotland on Chambers Street in Edinburgh.
Submitted for A logical next step in the November 09 Monthly Scavenger Hunt.
Sign on the Beaverton Hillsdale library, which I think is actually totally wrong. The world is logical; it is people that are not!
The sign is in Portland, Oregon. (On the Beaverton-Hillsdale Highway,
between Portland and Beaverton). I have no affiliation - I just drive
or ride the bus past the sign most days. The sign is located here (via mapquest).
Here is a cool link to Flash Earth which gives a satellite image of the sign!
A door without windows - perfectly logical for a barn, but, with the roof hanging like a hat, the building somehow appears to be blind. We look through windows and, by poetry, the building somehow sees as well. Many modern buildings have too many windows or have windows that masque as walls.
The roof itself has a curved apex where five or six circles of stone have been added to give it a point - the sort of 'épi de faîtage' that really wants only to be a roof.
Rapid strata formation in soft sand (field evidence).
Photo of strata formation in soft sand on a beach, created by tidal action of the sea.
Formed in a single, high tidal event. Stunning evidence which displays multiple strata/layers.
Why this is so important ....
It has long been assumed, ever since the 17th century, that layers/strata observed in sedimentary rocks were built up gradually, layer upon layer, over many years. It certainly seemed logical at the time, from just looking at rocks, that lower layers would always be older than the layers above them, i.e. that lower layers were always laid down first followed, in time, by successive layers on top.
This was assumed to be true and became known as the superposition principle.
It was also assumed that a layer comprising a different material from a previous layer, represented a change in environmental conditions/factors.
These changes in composition of layers or strata were considered to represent different, geological eras on a global scale, spanning millions of years. This formed the basis for the Geologic Column, which is used to date rocks and also fossils. The evolutionary, 'fossil record' was based on the vast ages and assumed geological eras of the Geologic Column.
There was also circular reasoning applied with the assumed age of 'index' fossils (based on evolutionary beliefs & preconceptions) used to date strata in the Geologic Column. Dating strata from the assumed age of (index) fossils is known as Biostratigraphy.
We now know that, although these assumptions seemed logical, they are not supported by the evidence.
At the time, the mechanics of stratification were not properly known or studied.
An additional factor was that this assumed superposition and uniformitarian model became essential, with the wide acceptance of Darwinism, for the long ages required for progressive microbes-to-human evolution. There was no incentive to question or challenge the superposition, uniformitarian model, because the presumed, fossil 'record' had become dependant on it, and any change in the accepted model would present devastating implications for Darwinism.
This had the unfortunate effect of linking the study of geology so closely to Darwinism, that any study independent of Darwinian considerations was effectively stymied. This link of geology with Darwinian preconceptions is known as biostratigraphy.
Some other field evidence, in various situations, can be observed here: www.flickr.com/photos/101536517@N06/sets/72157635944904973/
and also in the links to stunning, experimental evidence, carried out by sedimentologists, given later.
_______________________________________________
GEOLOGIC PRINCIPLES (established by Nicholas Steno in the 17th Century):
What Nicolas Steno believed about strata formation is the basis of the principle of Superposition and the principle of Original Horizontality.
dictionary.sensagent.com/Law_of_superposition/en-en/
“Assuming that all rocks and minerals had once been fluid, Nicolas Steno reasoned that rock strata were formed when particles in a fluid such as water fell to the bottom. This process would leave horizontal layers. Thus Steno's principle of original horizontality states that rock layers form in the horizontal position, and any deviations from this horizontal position are due to the rocks being disturbed later.”)
BEDDING PLANES.
'Bedding plane' describes the surface in between each stratum which are formed during sediment deposition.
science.jrank.org/pages/6533/Strata.html
“Strata form during sediment deposition, that is, the laying down of sediment. Meanwhile, if a change in current speed or sediment grain size occurs or perhaps the sediment supply is cut off, a bedding plane forms. Bedding planes are surfaces that separate one stratum from another. Bedding planes can also form when the upper part of a sediment layer is eroded away before the next episode of deposition. Strata separated by a bedding plane may have different grain sizes, grain compositions, or colours. Sometimes these other traits are better indicators of stratification as bedding planes may be very subtle.”
______________________________________________
Several catastrophic events, flash floods, volcanic eruptions etc. have forced Darwinian, influenced geologists to admit to rapid stratification in some instances. However they claim it is a rare phenomenon, which they have known about for many years, and which does nothing to invalidate the Geologic Column, the fossil record, evolutionary timescale, or any of the old assumptions regarding strata formation, sedimentation and the superposition principle. They fail to face up to the fact that rapid stratification is not an extraordinary phenonemon, but rather the prevailing and normal mechanism of sedimentary deposition whenever and wherever there is moving, sediment-laden water. The experimental evidence demonstrates the mechanism and a mass of field evidence in normal (non-catastrophic) conditions shows it is a normal everyday occurrence.
It is clear from the experimental evidence that the usual process of stratification is - that strata are not formed by horizontal layers being laid on top of each other in succession, as was assumed. But by sediment being sorted in the flowing water and laid down diagonally in the direction of flow. See diagram:
www.flickr.com/photos/truth-in-science/39821536092/in/dat...
The field evidence (in the image) presented here - of rapid, simultaneous stratification refutes the Superposition Principle and the Principle of Lateral Continuity.
We now know, the Superposition Principle only applies on a rare occasion where sedimentary deposits are laid down in still water.
Superposition is required for the long evolutionary timescale, but the evidence shows it is not the general rule, as was once believed. Most sediment is laid down in moving water, where particle segregation is the general rule, resulting in the simultaneous deposition of strata/layers as shown in the photo.
See many other examples of rapid stratification (with geological features): www.flickr.com/photos/101536517@N06/sets/72157635944904973/
Rapid, simultaneous formation of layers/strata, through particle segregation in moving water, is so easily created it has even been described by sedimentologists (working on flume experiments) as a law ...
"Upon filling the tank with water and pouring in sediments, we immediately saw what was to become the rule: The sediments sorted themselves out in very clear layers. This became so common that by the end of two weeks, we jokingly referred to Andrew's law as "It's difficult not to make layers," and Clark's law as "It's easy to make layers." Later on, I proposed the "law" that liquefaction destroys layers, as much to my surprise as that was." Ian Juby, www.ianjuby.org/sedimentation/
The example in the photo is the result of normal, everyday tidal action in a single incident. Where the water current or movement is more turbulent, violent, or catastrophic, great depths (many metres) of stratified sediment can be laid down in a short time. Certainly not the many millions of years assumed by evolutionists.
The composition of strata formed in any deposition event. is related to whatever materials are in the sediment mix, not to any particular timescale. Whatever is in the mix will be automatically sorted into strata/layers. It could be sand, or other material added from mud slides, erosion of chalk deposits, coastal erosion, volcanic ash etc. Any organic material (potential fossils), alive or dead, engulfed by, or swept into, a turbulent sediment mix, will also be sorted and buried within the rapidly, forming layers.
See many other examples of rapid stratification with geological features: www.flickr.com/photos/101536517@N06/sets/72157635944904973/
Stratified, soft sand deposit. demonstrates the rapid, stratification principle.
Important, field evidence which supports the work of the eminent, sedimentologist Dr Guy Berthault MIAS - Member of the International Association of Sedimentologists.
(Dr Berthault's experiments (www.sedimentology.fr/)
And also the experimental work of Dr M.E. Clark (Professor Emeritus, U of Illinois @ Urbana), Andrew Rodenbeck and Dr. Henry Voss, (www.ianjuby.org/sedimentation/)
Location: Sandown, Isle of Wight. Formed 08/12/2017, This field evidence demonstrates that multiple strata in sedimentary deposits do not need millions of years to form and can be formed rapidly. This natural example confirms the principle demonstrated by the sedimentation experiments carried out by Dr Guy Berthault and other sedimentologists. It calls into question the standard, multi-million year dating of sedimentary rocks, and the dating of fossils by depth of burial or position in the strata.
Mulltiple strata/layers are evident in this example.
Dr Berthault's experiments (www.sedimentology.fr/) and other experiments (www.ianjuby.org/sedimentation/) and field studies of floods and volcanic action show that, rather than being formed by gradual, slow deposition of sucessive layers superimposed upon previous layers, with the strata or layers representing a particular timescale, particle segregation in moving water or airborne particles can form strata or layers very quickly, frequently, in a single event.
And, most importantly, lower strata are not older than upper strata, they are the same age, having been created in the same sedimentary episode.
Such field studies confirm experiments which have shown that there is no longer any reason to conclude that strata/layers in sedimentary rocks relate to different geological eras and/or a multi-million year timescale. www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PVnBaqqQw8&feature=share&.... they also show that the relative position of fossils in rocks is not indicative of an order of evolutionary succession. Obviously, the uniformitarian principle, on which the geologic column is based, can no longer be considered valid. And the multi-million, year dating of sedimentary rocks and fossils needs to be reassessed. Rapid deposition of stratified sediments also explains the enigma of polystrate fossils, i.e. large fossils that intersect several strata. In some cases, tree trunk fossils are found which intersect the strata of sedimentary rock up to forty feet in depth. upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/08/Lycopsi... They must have been buried in stratified sediment in a short time (certainly not millions, thousands, or even hundreds of years), or they would have rotted away. youtu.be/vnzHU9VsliQ
In fact, the vast majority of fossils are found in good, intact condition, which is testament to their rapid burial. You don't get good fossils from gradual burial, because they would be damaged or destroyed by decay, predation or erosion. The existence of so many fossils in sedimentary rock on a global scale is stunning evidence for the rapid depostion of sedimentary rock as the general rule. It is obvious that all rock containing good intact fossils was formed from sediment laid down in a very short time, not millions, or even thousands of years.
See set of photos of other examples of rapid stratification: www.flickr.com/photos/101536517@N06/sets/72157635944904973/
Carbon dating of coal should not be possible if it is millions of years old, yet significant amounts of Carbon 14 have been detected in coal and other fossil material, which indicates that it is less than 50,000 years old. www.ldolphin.org/sewell/c14dating.html
www.grisda.org/origins/51006.htm
Evolutionists confidently cite multi-million year ages for rocks and fossils, but what most people don't realise is that no one actually knows the age of sedimentary rocks or the fossils found within them. So how are evolutionists so sure of the ages they so confidently quote? The astonishing thing is they aren't. Sedimentary rocks cannot be dated by radiometric methods*, and fossils can only be dated to less than 50,000 years with Carbon 14 dating. The method evolutionists use is based entirely on assumptions. Unbelievably, fossils are dated by the assumed age of rocks, and rocks are dated by the assumed age of fossils, that's right ... it is known as circular reasoning.
* Regarding the radiometric dating of igneous rocks, which is claimed to be relevant to the dating of sedimentary rocks, in an occasional instance there is an igneous intrusion associated with a sedimentary deposit -
Prof. Aubouin says in his Précis de Géologie: "Each radioactive element disintegrates in a characteristic and constant manner, which depends neither on the physical state (no variation with pressure or temperature or any other external constraint) nor on the chemical state (identical for an oxide or a phosphate)."
"Rocks form when magma crystallizes. Crystallisation depends on pressure and temperature, from which radioactivity is independent. So, there is no relationship between radioactivity and crystallisation.
Consequently, radioactivity doesn't date the formation of rocks. Moreover, daughter elements contained in rocks result mainly from radioactivity in magma where gravity separates the heavier parent element, from the lighter daughter element. Thus radiometric dating has no chronological signification." Dr. Guy Berthault www.sciencevsevolution.org/Berthault.htm
Visit the fossil museum:
www.flickr.com/photos/101536517@N06/sets/72157641367196613/
Just how good are peer reviews of scientific papers?
www.sciencemag.org/content/342/6154/60.full
www.examiner.com/article/want-to-publish-science-paper-ju...
The neo-Darwinian idea that the human genome consists entirely of an accumulation of billions of mutations is, quite obviously, completely bonkers. Nevertheless, it is compulsorily taught in schools and universities as 'science'.
Masterminds are introspective, introverted, logical, rational, pragmatic, clear-headed, directive, bright, and attentive. As strategists, they are better than any other type at brainstorming approaches to situations. Masterminds are capable but not eager leaders, stepping forward only when it becomes obvious to them that they are the best for the job. Strong-willed and very self-assured, they may make this decision quickly, as they tend to make all decisions. But though they are decisive, they are open to new evidence and new ideas, flexible in their planning to accommodate changing situations. They tend to excel at judging the usefulness of ideas and will apply whatever seems most efficient to them in accomplishing their clearly envisioned goals. To Masterminds, what matters is getting it done—but also learning the principles of how to get it done efficiently and well, that is, at a professional level of quality. However, they may not give much thought to the social cost of getting there, "focusing so tightly on their own pursuits [that] they can ignore the points of view and wishes of others.
Masterminds are highly pragmatic, and they will put forth a great deal of time and effort to implement effective ideas. They are driven to solve complex problems and to create organized, decided, and executed solutions. Masterminds tend to make positive statements instead of negative ones, focusing on how to make the organization more efficient in the future rather than dwelling on past mistakes.
Masterminds are also highly theoretical, and one of the more open-minded of the 16 role variants. Before Masterminds adopt a theoretical notion, they insist on researching all the available data and checking the idea against reality. Masterminds are suspicious of theories based on poor research and will discard ideas that cannot be effectively implemented.
As leaders, Masterminds are skilled in contingency planning and entailment organizing, which are directive activities that tell the planner what activities to do and in what order to do them. Once in a position of power, Masterminds are known for their efficiency and willingness to adopt useful ideas.