View allAll Photos Tagged Themovement
SFU night commuters... Joel's carrying my sign!
The Vancouver Global Night Commute, April 29th, 2006. Find out more about how we helped get the word out about Uganda's Invisible Children and how you can too: www.invisiblechildren.com/home.php
Lacey, Marcy and more SFU students who did the Commute.
The Vancouver Global Night Commute, April 29th, 2006. Find out more about how we helped get the word out about Uganda's Invisible Children and how you can too: www.invisiblechildren.com/home.php
Street artist Nathan Bowen begins a new work in Whitechapel. He was cool about having his photo taken and posted on Flickr.
ift.tt/1KOdMOh HOW CAN I BE SCARED OF A HUMAN HOW CAN I BE SCARED OF THE NEXT MAN #STORMZY #HIPHOPISLIFE #KILLINGTHEMIC #LINKUPTV #UKHIPHOP #THEMOVEMENT
The Vancouver Global Night Commute, April 29th, 2006. Find out more about how we helped get the word out about Uganda's Invisible Children and how you can too: www.invisiblechildren.com/home.php
2021 New Years : King Russell Entertainment
Christopher Starrs: AL
#DopeBoyBluez
#Dastranger
#sonymusic
#universalmusicgroup
#universalmusic
#southernsoul
#kingrussellentertainment
#DeathRoseRecords
#THEMOVEMENT
#WeAreLUM
#iLYTRULY
To go in my sign collection. Seafood shop on East Hastings St., Vancouver, BC.
The Vancouver Global Night Commute, April 29th, 2006. Find out more about how we helped get the word out about Uganda's Invisible Children and how you can too: www.invisiblechildren.com/home.php
.
Join the UGBM to defeat the agents of Lvngdoh.
I l and to Uphold the JNUSU Constitution! .
By deciding to stand by Lyngdoh and inviting its imposition in will be a turned into a puppet which will depend onthe administrationJNU, the grand alliance of AISA, SFI, ABVP and NSUI has for its very existence. You can very well understand whose interest exposed their true colours. Now these opportunist organisations such a Lyngdoh-union will serve. 1 want the students' approval to their act of betrayal. In the UGBM .
Lyngdoh "with relaxations as an interim measure" is an.
they are going to propose that we should accept Lyngdoh with "some .
eyewash. AI SA and SFI think that the common students are foolishrelaxations" and conduct JNUSU elections. These organisations .
enough to buy their blatant lies of a 'relaxed' Lyngdoh. If allowed to.
think that by hoodwinking the students and by uniting all their enter JNU, Lyngdoh will not be an 'interim measure' but a permanent.
organisational strength, they will win the day in the UGBM. The .
replacement for JNUSU Constitution. The ongoing legal challenge in.
question is, are we ready to endorse their opportunism? Are we . .
the Supreme Court will effectively end if we surrender to Lyngdoh atgoing to ignore the uncanny bonhomie of organisations like ABVP, _ .
this stage. The democratic exercise of students' union elections willAISA, NSUI and SFI with their much-proclaimed differences of be converted into another process of selection and rejection by theideology? Are we -the student community -ready to be a party to .
administration on the basis of a student's 'merit' and 'eligibilit(this politics of betrayal, surrender and compromise? Or we will come .
Moreover, the big gains of our four-year long political struggle.
out to the UGBM to defend the forty years of JNU's progressive .
against Lyngdoh will be irrevocably lost, and the last legal battlestudent movement, the JNUSU and its Constitution? It is the student against Lyngdoh in the whole country will also come to an end. Acommunity -and not this or that organisation -which have time and Lyngdoh-union will weaken JNU's student movement and strengthenagain rose up in the last four decades of JNU's history to fight che administration in an unprecedented manner. The doors toagainst anti-student and authoritarian attacks. Once again, the time privalisation and commercialisation of the campus with heightened.
ngo has come for each one of us to be counted in the coming UGBM .
fees and user-charges for students' facilities will be opened without.
' .
against the opportunists AI SA-SFI who have surrendered to the an effective students' union to counter it. The forces of casteism,authoritarian, meritocratic and pro-corporate Lyngdoh. .
meritocracy, and fascisrn represen.ted.by ABVP-NSUI-SFI-YFE will AISA and SFI are fully aware of the dangers of compromising be emboldened and will have an unrestrained sway on the campus. with Lyngdoh, but they have been consciously working to bring Such a union will become another tool in the hands of the .
Lyngdoh in JNU for along time. SFI's 'Opinion poll' and the call for a administration to launch fresh onslaughts against the Dalits, OBCs, referendumlast month was a clever move to open the doors for Muslims, women, and other oppressed sections of students. Lyngdoh. AI SA also proposed Lyngdoh as an option in the last Surrender before Lyngdoh is NOT our only option, as AISA-SFIUGBM. The students have not forgotten the way in which the gang .
is propagating. Struggle is our alternative. There is a genuine.
of AISA-SFI-ABVP-NSUI fled from the ongoing UGBM after a aspiration among the students for elections and electedmysterious phone call from Gopal Subramaniam. Unable to explain representatives, but not at the cost of accepting Lyngdoh. We musttheir opportunism, these organisations have even questioned the uphold the JNUSU Constitution and all its democratic provisions andmandate of the UGBM of 19 September whichcategorically rejected reject Lyngdoh in toto. DSU has proposed the conducting of interimLyngdoh in JNU and upheld the JNUSU Constitution. Led by AI SA elections to the JSC with JNUSU Constitution as its guiding.
and SFI with ABVP and NSUI ran for 'negotiation' by undermining framework. This will fulfil the purpose of students' representation.
the JSC and its collective functioning. AI SA is nowclaiming that without Lyngdoh and by upholding JNUSU's Constitution. Like'negotiations' have been successfully concluded. But it is hiding the .
JNUSU, every School can elect their Councillors to the JSC while thereal nature and the outcome of the 'negotiations', and the dangerous four office-bearers including the President and General Secretary.
provisions of draconian Lyngdoh in their entirety. AI SA and SFI-the can be directly elected by the students. Once elected, the electedh;7 ringleaders of this compromise -have maintained a calculated .
I .
council of the JSC can lead the students' movement as its legitimatesilence on the implications of the compromise, the possible violation representative. Acting on this alternative, the students of JNU willof JNUSU Constitution or the impact of Lyngdoh on JNU's student send a strong message of our protest against Lyngdoh and themovement. In exchange for one or two token 'relaxations', they have administration, whereas accepting Lyngdoh will signal our prostrationaccepted all the draconian provisions of Lyngdoh. Now they want before authority. An elected JSC is a much better alternative to a.
legitimacy and expect a stamp of approval from the student puppet unianm the garb of JNUSU..
community in the upcoming UGBM! .
Lyngdoh-is a crucial milestone on the road toward turning JNUTo accept Lyngdoh a complete abandonment of the progressive into an elite and exclusive enclave of privileged students.and democratic JNUSU Constitution: Just one example of the so-Depoliticisation of the student community, crushing of the studentcalled Grievance Redressal Cell is enough to expose the danger of movement and attack on the students' right to unionise are some of AISA-SFI-ABVP-NSUI's 'negotiation'. This 'Cell' which will be .
the aims of Lyngdoh. Therefore, each and every student andconstituted by the administration as per Lyngdoh will have the power students' organisation who votes for Lyngdoh in the upcomingto dismiss elected members of JNUSU, while the Vice Chancellor will UGBM will be held responsible for such eventualities. AISA and SFIbe the final authority to decide on all election-related disputes. This will be remembered as betrayers and opportunists in the history ofis completely against the autonomy and independence of JNUSU JNU's student movement for kneeling before Lyngdoh. Will you alsoelections, which has been conducted for the last four decades be a part of it? Or you will voice your total opposition to Lyngdoh inentirely by the student community without any administrative the UGBM on 3rd October? DSU appeals to each one of you tointerference. This is because JNUSU Constitution does not allow any participate in the UGBM to defend JNUSU's Constitution and to .role for the administration in the elections. If we accept Lyngdoh in reject Lyngdoh in its totality. We are confident that together, we WJIIthe coming UGBM and conduct elections accordingly, such an fight and defeat the agents of Lyngdoh.'official' unionwill be at the mercy of the administration. The JNUSU .
Qo .
.