View allAll Photos Tagged SmartOffices
This image is excerpted from a U.S. GAO report:
www.gao.gov/products/GAO-12-211
SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION AND NOTIFICATION ACT: Jurisdictions Face Challenges to Implementing the Act, and Stakeholders Report Positive and Negative Effects
Note: In administering the standards set forth in SORNA, the SMART Office is responsible for making determinations on whether covered jurisdictions have substantially implemented the minimum requirements of the law. While the term “substantial implementation” is not defined in the Adam Walsh Act, SORNA delegated to the Attorney General the authority to determine whether a jurisdiction has failed to substantially implement the act (see 42 U.S.C. §16925) and the SORNA National Guidelines for Sex Offender Registration and Notification, issued in July 2008, further clarify that the SMART Office is responsible for determining whether a jurisdiction has sufficiently implemented measures to have substantially implemented SORNA. Each jurisdiction is to submit a comprehensive set of materials (which we refer to as a complete implementation package in this report) so as to allow an assigned SMART Office policy adviser to conduct a substantial implementation review. These materials can include applicable state statutes, codes, administrative policy and procedures manuals, and documentation of database or data-sharing systems and the jurisdiction’s public sex offender website.
The smart printer in the smart office scenario transfers documents from the smartphone to the printer via NFC.
The Security Assistant provides information about the security level for transferring information to the receptionist.
The security assistant provides a trust feedback framework to give users security and privacy information about the action they are performing.