PaRCha - JNU - AISA - 2007 ID-4105
.
r.
-.
arready know how the AFSPA far from curbing "terrorists" is actually a living terror for the common people of.
,. .
North-East and Kashmir. On the Sethusamudram project too, the BJP's position was weak and unconvincing -since the NDA Govt itself had initiated and passed the project, and since there was no evidence whatsoever that the reef was a man-made .
construction. However, the UPA Government surrendered abjectly to the Sangh Parivar and BJP's communal .
designs and attempts to pass off mythology as histor-y, by withdrawing the ASI's affidavit on the issue and taking .
action against the ASl officials who had quite rightly pointed out that mythological texts could not be used to prove the historical existence ofa 'Ram bridge'. ical Continuing with the BJP-Ied NDA regime's foreign policy, the UPA Government has tied India in 'strategic' slavery >en..
UPA-United Partners OfAmerica?! .
est, .
to tbe imperialist USA. The red carpet welcome to George Bush, the vote against the Iran at the IAEA and the Nuke gly .
energy needs of India's growing economy are proved to be a lie by the fact that at best, by 2020, nuclear energy will .
Deal are proofof the UPA GovL's pro-imperialist positions. The UPA Govt. 's claims that the Nuke Deal will solve the tUS. .
provide merely 7% -and that too not 7% of India's total energy needs but just India's electricity needs. Apart from .
formidable costs of imported nuclear plants, there are enormous environmental, health and safety hazards. Real .
purpose of the Nuke Deal is not energy but larger strategic relationship between USA and India whereby USA will .
closely control every aspect of India's economy, military and foreign policy. The Hyde Act reveals the real text ofthis .
.
om .
slavish deal: whereby the Deal is contingent on India's foreign policy being 'congruent' to that of the USA. BJP's 'opposition' to the deal is purely farcical as they were the original proponents of the deal. Unfortunately, CPl-CPI(M), ~te .
is performing yet another political theatre of pretending to "oppose'' the deal. CPI-CPI(M)must explain : why .
hit .
afterall they are not asking for· a vote on the deal in the Parliament? Why are CPI-CPI(M) interested only in lee .
"pause" and "debate"(without vote) and not eject and reject? ng .
Not just this, the UPA Govt. is strengthening everyday its military, commercial and strategic ties with racist .
on .
~re.
colonialist Israeli and the military dictatorship of Burma even in the face of their increasing brutality. Shockingly .
CPI-CPI(M) and their representatives in our campus, once again, never condemn UPA's military and .
commercial support with these killer and racist regimes. Infact, CPI(M) govt in Bengal itself bas commercial to .
ties with colonial and racist Israel! ~d .
JNUSU in the face of the Burning Questions ofOur Time .
The ongoing people's movements and their brutal repression by the state, as well as the assault of anti-people policies .
Vice President and General Secretary, who ensured continuous support of JNU students against displacement, demand a powerful support and solidarity by JNUSU. However it was only that section of JNUSU, led by the JNUSU .
draconian laws and caste repression in the country. The other section of JNUSU leadership were conspicuous by .
their silence, as they were more keen to serve their political bosses in UPA and CPI(M) government in West .
Bengal. .
In the face of renewed offensive by YFE, and their machinations to stall 27% reservation, social humiliation and On Reservations and Rights ofSC/STs and OBCs (l .
virulent casteist attacks through administrative and social means against the forces of social justice, JNUSU led by the YP and Gen. Secy articulated a strong position in the April I0 AC meeting, in favour of implementation of 27% .
reservation and 54% seat increase without any staggering in JNU. When the Supreme Court stay on OBC quota, it was .
JNUSU YP and Gen. Secy alone who called for a Protest March on campus and at Parliament Street. Implementation .
of 27% reservation remains a key question and all attempts to derail it must be robustly countered. .
quotas in AIIMS and protested against the brutal lynching ofa dalit coliege student, Chandras~n by upper caste goons We stood in solidarity with AIIMS doctors against the victimization of dalits and violation of Constitutional SC/ST .
in Pratapgarh, U.P. .
The JNUSU VP and Gen. Secy. orga 11ised a prol~st-dcmo against the Nandigram firing and masscre; this .
On Struggles Against Corporate Land Ga·ab and Police Firing .
was boycotted by the .JNUSU Vic~ President and Joint Secretary. The JNUSU General Secretary ''isited Siugur in December 2006, foilowing Tapasi Malik's ntpe and mlrdcr uy CPI(M) leaders. .
In the case of the Khammam firing also, it was th~ JNUSU VP and Gen. Sccy who called for a Protest .
Demo. while the .JNUSli President boycotted it! Such silences and boycotts can only be explained by the .
.
fact that CPl(M) itself is engaged in the worst form of state repression and forced eviction of peasantry in .
unmam bccaus£' in th~ mh·ror ·Of Khammam, they see the .
~.
West Bengal for SEZs! They arc silent on Kh.
face ofNandigrn.m. .
.
PaRCha - JNU - AISA - 2007 ID-4105
.
r.
-.
arready know how the AFSPA far from curbing "terrorists" is actually a living terror for the common people of.
,. .
North-East and Kashmir. On the Sethusamudram project too, the BJP's position was weak and unconvincing -since the NDA Govt itself had initiated and passed the project, and since there was no evidence whatsoever that the reef was a man-made .
construction. However, the UPA Government surrendered abjectly to the Sangh Parivar and BJP's communal .
designs and attempts to pass off mythology as histor-y, by withdrawing the ASI's affidavit on the issue and taking .
action against the ASl officials who had quite rightly pointed out that mythological texts could not be used to prove the historical existence ofa 'Ram bridge'. ical Continuing with the BJP-Ied NDA regime's foreign policy, the UPA Government has tied India in 'strategic' slavery >en..
UPA-United Partners OfAmerica?! .
est, .
to tbe imperialist USA. The red carpet welcome to George Bush, the vote against the Iran at the IAEA and the Nuke gly .
energy needs of India's growing economy are proved to be a lie by the fact that at best, by 2020, nuclear energy will .
Deal are proofof the UPA GovL's pro-imperialist positions. The UPA Govt. 's claims that the Nuke Deal will solve the tUS. .
provide merely 7% -and that too not 7% of India's total energy needs but just India's electricity needs. Apart from .
formidable costs of imported nuclear plants, there are enormous environmental, health and safety hazards. Real .
purpose of the Nuke Deal is not energy but larger strategic relationship between USA and India whereby USA will .
closely control every aspect of India's economy, military and foreign policy. The Hyde Act reveals the real text ofthis .
.
om .
slavish deal: whereby the Deal is contingent on India's foreign policy being 'congruent' to that of the USA. BJP's 'opposition' to the deal is purely farcical as they were the original proponents of the deal. Unfortunately, CPl-CPI(M), ~te .
is performing yet another political theatre of pretending to "oppose'' the deal. CPI-CPI(M)must explain : why .
hit .
afterall they are not asking for· a vote on the deal in the Parliament? Why are CPI-CPI(M) interested only in lee .
"pause" and "debate"(without vote) and not eject and reject? ng .
Not just this, the UPA Govt. is strengthening everyday its military, commercial and strategic ties with racist .
on .
~re.
colonialist Israeli and the military dictatorship of Burma even in the face of their increasing brutality. Shockingly .
CPI-CPI(M) and their representatives in our campus, once again, never condemn UPA's military and .
commercial support with these killer and racist regimes. Infact, CPI(M) govt in Bengal itself bas commercial to .
ties with colonial and racist Israel! ~d .
JNUSU in the face of the Burning Questions ofOur Time .
The ongoing people's movements and their brutal repression by the state, as well as the assault of anti-people policies .
Vice President and General Secretary, who ensured continuous support of JNU students against displacement, demand a powerful support and solidarity by JNUSU. However it was only that section of JNUSU, led by the JNUSU .
draconian laws and caste repression in the country. The other section of JNUSU leadership were conspicuous by .
their silence, as they were more keen to serve their political bosses in UPA and CPI(M) government in West .
Bengal. .
In the face of renewed offensive by YFE, and their machinations to stall 27% reservation, social humiliation and On Reservations and Rights ofSC/STs and OBCs (l .
virulent casteist attacks through administrative and social means against the forces of social justice, JNUSU led by the YP and Gen. Secy articulated a strong position in the April I0 AC meeting, in favour of implementation of 27% .
reservation and 54% seat increase without any staggering in JNU. When the Supreme Court stay on OBC quota, it was .
JNUSU YP and Gen. Secy alone who called for a Protest March on campus and at Parliament Street. Implementation .
of 27% reservation remains a key question and all attempts to derail it must be robustly countered. .
quotas in AIIMS and protested against the brutal lynching ofa dalit coliege student, Chandras~n by upper caste goons We stood in solidarity with AIIMS doctors against the victimization of dalits and violation of Constitutional SC/ST .
in Pratapgarh, U.P. .
The JNUSU VP and Gen. Secy. orga 11ised a prol~st-dcmo against the Nandigram firing and masscre; this .
On Struggles Against Corporate Land Ga·ab and Police Firing .
was boycotted by the .JNUSU Vic~ President and Joint Secretary. The JNUSU General Secretary ''isited Siugur in December 2006, foilowing Tapasi Malik's ntpe and mlrdcr uy CPI(M) leaders. .
In the case of the Khammam firing also, it was th~ JNUSU VP and Gen. Sccy who called for a Protest .
Demo. while the .JNUSli President boycotted it! Such silences and boycotts can only be explained by the .
.
fact that CPl(M) itself is engaged in the worst form of state repression and forced eviction of peasantry in .
unmam bccaus£' in th~ mh·ror ·Of Khammam, they see the .
~.
West Bengal for SEZs! They arc silent on Kh.
face ofNandigrn.m. .
.