PaRCha - JNU - All Organisations - 2012 ID-54438
.
.
2 7{-3f2..0 l,_ .
23-31 March: ShahadatSaptaab .
BhagatSingh toCom. Chandrashekhar:the LegacyLivesOn.... .
.
speakers.
Pu b11 c MeetioCl.
.
-Paraniov Guha Thakllla .
KG Basin To Coal-Gate: Neoliberalism .
noted journalist and petionerin2G case.
and Corporate Loot of Natural Resources .
Priva .Pillai .
27 March Tonight Kaveri Mess 9.30pm-----researcher and activist .
. .
.
From 2G to the recent coal scam, the CAG has pointed out the same underlying proqlem -loss to the pubic exchequer .
due to a policy of handing over precious natural resources on a "first-come-first-serve'', basis rather than being auctioned. .
Whether it is the 1.76 lakl1 crore (2G) or Rs 10.7 lakh crore in the coal .
.
scam, the CAG has pointed out absence of .
transparent auctions as the reason for massive losses. .
.
The issue however is much deeper. The larger question is. can we arrest all "losses to the state excheQuer" merely by .
auctioning off resources to the highest bidder? Can it be in the national interest to let private players use up and .
indiscriminately exhaust these precious resources as per their whims and fancies .
.
merely for private profits, .
robbing future generations of Indian people of these resources? Even if a resource like coal were to be adioned off .
to a company, the state receives a one-time payment or some miniscule royalty, which is a pittance of the t~profit that .
it finally makes from mining. .
.
Natural Resources in the Neo-Uberal Era: Tools for Corporate Profiteering .
-'In the past few years. we have seen the oil and natur?l gas-rich Krishna Godavari (KG) basin been handed over to Reliance .
for private profiteering. A previo us CAG report has exposed how a dubious "production sharing contracr was signed .
between the government and private petroleum operators. data on Reliance's capital expenditure was deliberately fudged .
and inflated. private operators were allowed to sell oil at much higher rates than ONGC. Niira Radia tapes have also told us.
.
. -how the UPA a·nd the "op·posrtion" NDA happily colluded on the floor of the Parliament to award milfions of rupees to .
Reliance as "retrospective" tax exemptions! herefore, the issue is NOT merely one of reverting to the "correct" .
policy of auctioning natural resources. .
.
Post-independence, coal was recognised as a "national asset" which the state should manage, keeping il mind the .
interests of the "community". Coal was thus nationalised -a process that began in 1971 and was completed in 1973. Soon .
afterwards however, the real project of "nationalisation" began to unravel. As early as 1976, a clause was irl1rodtced in the .
Coal Nationalisation Act to allow coal blocks to be allotted to private iron and steel (and in some limited cases. to private .
power companies too) for their captive consumption. .
.
The ongoing process of privatising coal mining proceeded with great speed in the 1990s -the Coal NcO:lnalisation .
Act was amended in 1993 to allow allotment of captive coal mining blocks to private power companies. Coal prices were .
deregulated by the Ministry of Coal, and in 1996, the MoC issued yet another notification allowing cement COOlpanies to .
acquire captive coal mining blocks. .
.
And as the CAG report no w exposes, between 2004-2009, coal mining blocks were handed out on a platter at a .
pittance to private companies who mine coal as and when they can make the most profits. When the issue of .
.
allotting coal blocks at ridiculously low rates became too difficult for the UPA to handle. they finally introduced the new .
MMOR Act 2011 , which recommends auctioning of coal blocks. .
.
Besides this hyper-actrve neo-liberal policy shift favouring corporate profits. we are also witnessing how the state machinery .
sits back and watches rampant violations and open loot of mineral resources by the politician-mafia nexus -flom Bellary .
in Karnataka, to the coal belt in Chhattisgarh and MP, to mineral-rich areas in Odisha and Jharkhand. .
.
Also, this time around the PMO cannot even pretend (as it tried to do in the 2G scam) not to be ii'MJhred. After all, coal ministry was directly under Prime Minister Manmohan Singh for long stretches during 2004-2009 when these dubious allocation of coal blocks took place and therefore complicit in this loss of resources. Several of the companies named in the draft CAG report that is causing such a furore are based in BJP-ruled Chhattisgarh. It is dear that after all the public sound and fury, the so-called "opposition" BJPwill also w illingly participate in a carefully orchestrated .
cover-up in order to hide the huge share they enjoy in this regime of corporate loot. So whether the so-caned opposition" NDA-BJP chooses to raise the issue or not, whether the CAG chooses to backtrack on its own draft esituates or not, the ·~ubious nature of allocation of coal blocks and the obvious possibility of mega corruption illvolved in the pro-cess CANNOT be brushed under the carpet ANYMORE. .
'.
In designing a mineral policy for the entire country. it is important to ask: will state policy be decided by corporate profits, or by the larger interests of the people? In the case of an important resource like coal, why should public sector companies have to engage in cut-throat competition with the likes of the Jindals and the Tatas? Why should private conpanies be allotted captive coal mining blocks? Why can't they simply purchase all the coal they require from Coalln<fe. instead of .
acquiring coal blocks and then using them as speculative capital to profit from ? .
AISA is organising a public meeting tonight (March 27'h) from 9.30 pm onwards at Kaveri mess, wheh will be .
addressed by Paranjoy Guha Thakurta (noted journalist who has extensively reported on the regime of corporate loot of natural resources) and Priya Pillai (a researcher and activist). We appeal to the student community to participate in this public meeting in large numbers to d1scuss these important issues related to the use and misuse of natural resources. .
' Piyush, Vice-President, AISA, JNU Omprsad, Jt. Secy., AISA,JN U .
.
.
PaRCha - JNU - All Organisations - 2012 ID-54438
.
.
2 7{-3f2..0 l,_ .
23-31 March: ShahadatSaptaab .
BhagatSingh toCom. Chandrashekhar:the LegacyLivesOn.... .
.
speakers.
Pu b11 c MeetioCl.
.
-Paraniov Guha Thakllla .
KG Basin To Coal-Gate: Neoliberalism .
noted journalist and petionerin2G case.
and Corporate Loot of Natural Resources .
Priva .Pillai .
27 March Tonight Kaveri Mess 9.30pm-----researcher and activist .
. .
.
From 2G to the recent coal scam, the CAG has pointed out the same underlying proqlem -loss to the pubic exchequer .
due to a policy of handing over precious natural resources on a "first-come-first-serve'', basis rather than being auctioned. .
Whether it is the 1.76 lakl1 crore (2G) or Rs 10.7 lakh crore in the coal .
.
scam, the CAG has pointed out absence of .
transparent auctions as the reason for massive losses. .
.
The issue however is much deeper. The larger question is. can we arrest all "losses to the state excheQuer" merely by .
auctioning off resources to the highest bidder? Can it be in the national interest to let private players use up and .
indiscriminately exhaust these precious resources as per their whims and fancies .
.
merely for private profits, .
robbing future generations of Indian people of these resources? Even if a resource like coal were to be adioned off .
to a company, the state receives a one-time payment or some miniscule royalty, which is a pittance of the t~profit that .
it finally makes from mining. .
.
Natural Resources in the Neo-Uberal Era: Tools for Corporate Profiteering .
-'In the past few years. we have seen the oil and natur?l gas-rich Krishna Godavari (KG) basin been handed over to Reliance .
for private profiteering. A previo us CAG report has exposed how a dubious "production sharing contracr was signed .
between the government and private petroleum operators. data on Reliance's capital expenditure was deliberately fudged .
and inflated. private operators were allowed to sell oil at much higher rates than ONGC. Niira Radia tapes have also told us.
.
. -how the UPA a·nd the "op·posrtion" NDA happily colluded on the floor of the Parliament to award milfions of rupees to .
Reliance as "retrospective" tax exemptions! herefore, the issue is NOT merely one of reverting to the "correct" .
policy of auctioning natural resources. .
.
Post-independence, coal was recognised as a "national asset" which the state should manage, keeping il mind the .
interests of the "community". Coal was thus nationalised -a process that began in 1971 and was completed in 1973. Soon .
afterwards however, the real project of "nationalisation" began to unravel. As early as 1976, a clause was irl1rodtced in the .
Coal Nationalisation Act to allow coal blocks to be allotted to private iron and steel (and in some limited cases. to private .
power companies too) for their captive consumption. .
.
The ongoing process of privatising coal mining proceeded with great speed in the 1990s -the Coal NcO:lnalisation .
Act was amended in 1993 to allow allotment of captive coal mining blocks to private power companies. Coal prices were .
deregulated by the Ministry of Coal, and in 1996, the MoC issued yet another notification allowing cement COOlpanies to .
acquire captive coal mining blocks. .
.
And as the CAG report no w exposes, between 2004-2009, coal mining blocks were handed out on a platter at a .
pittance to private companies who mine coal as and when they can make the most profits. When the issue of .
.
allotting coal blocks at ridiculously low rates became too difficult for the UPA to handle. they finally introduced the new .
MMOR Act 2011 , which recommends auctioning of coal blocks. .
.
Besides this hyper-actrve neo-liberal policy shift favouring corporate profits. we are also witnessing how the state machinery .
sits back and watches rampant violations and open loot of mineral resources by the politician-mafia nexus -flom Bellary .
in Karnataka, to the coal belt in Chhattisgarh and MP, to mineral-rich areas in Odisha and Jharkhand. .
.
Also, this time around the PMO cannot even pretend (as it tried to do in the 2G scam) not to be ii'MJhred. After all, coal ministry was directly under Prime Minister Manmohan Singh for long stretches during 2004-2009 when these dubious allocation of coal blocks took place and therefore complicit in this loss of resources. Several of the companies named in the draft CAG report that is causing such a furore are based in BJP-ruled Chhattisgarh. It is dear that after all the public sound and fury, the so-called "opposition" BJPwill also w illingly participate in a carefully orchestrated .
cover-up in order to hide the huge share they enjoy in this regime of corporate loot. So whether the so-caned opposition" NDA-BJP chooses to raise the issue or not, whether the CAG chooses to backtrack on its own draft esituates or not, the ·~ubious nature of allocation of coal blocks and the obvious possibility of mega corruption illvolved in the pro-cess CANNOT be brushed under the carpet ANYMORE. .
'.
In designing a mineral policy for the entire country. it is important to ask: will state policy be decided by corporate profits, or by the larger interests of the people? In the case of an important resource like coal, why should public sector companies have to engage in cut-throat competition with the likes of the Jindals and the Tatas? Why should private conpanies be allotted captive coal mining blocks? Why can't they simply purchase all the coal they require from Coalln<fe. instead of .
acquiring coal blocks and then using them as speculative capital to profit from ? .
AISA is organising a public meeting tonight (March 27'h) from 9.30 pm onwards at Kaveri mess, wheh will be .
addressed by Paranjoy Guha Thakurta (noted journalist who has extensively reported on the regime of corporate loot of natural resources) and Priya Pillai (a researcher and activist). We appeal to the student community to participate in this public meeting in large numbers to d1scuss these important issues related to the use and misuse of natural resources. .
' Piyush, Vice-President, AISA, JNU Omprsad, Jt. Secy., AISA,JN U .
.
.