Works by Bruno Wapoth and Amber Sena
Two works by Bruno Walpoth
In the XIX century, Jacob Burckhardt was calling Bellini’s altarpieces
Existenzbilder, “pictures of existence”, and the first thing that stands
out when looking at the works of Bruno Walpoth is their pure and
sufficient “existence”. However, this strong presence is wrapped and
isolated by empty spaces, detached from any context and without
any attributes that qualify its identity.
They are figures of the absolute, carved in lime, apple or walnut
wood, in which elegance and solidity are features with which the
sculptor measures the harmony between naturalism and invention.
The agreement is between “no motion” gestures and the absence of
manifest feelings. The eyes of the molded figures stare at a distant
point and rarely meet those of the spectator. Since the eyes are
detectors of emotions, if the contact with the other is almost denied,
the statues become distant, absorbed in their existence, swallowed
up by their thoughts.
This monumental fixity has ancient origins, it takes us back to the
Roman statuary, also paying homage to the fifteenth-century
tradition, especially the manner of Piero della Francesca. Likewise,
the humanity that Bruno Walpoth examines and creates, diversified
in poses, colors and patterns, always represents the same “ideal
greatness” of those who, corroded by doubt, oscillate between the
search for the good and the attraction towards evil.
Rabbi Nachman of Bratislava said: “The world makes two mistakes:
the first one consists in thinking that a great man can do no wrong,
and the second one is believing that when a great man makes a
mistake he ceases to be great.”
Walpoth instills in his sculptures this complacent awareness of being
caged in the dilemma preceding the right action to take and therefore
they do not perform any action. Nevertheless, the ability of the
sculptor in calibrating the synthesis of bodies and his attention to
detail lead the viewer to capture and essentially transcend the
physical and material aspects, and any expressiveness or limb
movement is no longer needed to determine its meaning.
The thin irregular touches of white enrich the wood tissue preventing
immobility of light on volumes, while the shades of the hair or little
clothing enliven the figures with visual and tactile values, but without
affecting the solemn guise or that sense of magic and silence that
embody the art of Bruno Walpoth, being its wonderful constant
PLUS
A work by Amber Sena
It is as if the work of Amber Sena wanted to resist the temptation
of indifference that often characterizes the contemporary forms,
and where the issue of proximity, of urgency as regards to
instances precisely related to the environment and to the human,
emerges as an edge of the modern. The work of Sena deals with
one of the capital issues of our time, and not only in the name of
defense of animals. The artist focuses on the traces of a sense
that perhaps can snatch us from such indifference, stating the
responsibility of art, once again called to participate in a present
we should take charge of.
Nightwatch, the Chased into the Dark series, Nightingale represent
the enigma, and a question not asking for an answer. The size of the
work implies that narrative impose itself, beyond artistic classification,
as an unavoidable need to think about what one does not want to
see. We are both attracted and repelled, we curiously approach, and
the work stands before us in the form of a vision questioning the
human and the subjectivity. First and last issue.
The story is therefore tripartite. South Africa, at nightfall the moaning
of a wounded rhinoceros breaks the silence of plains. The cub, near the
body of a dying mother, sees his destiny fulfilled and added to a tragic
statistic. As a solitary mountain in the moonlight, the silhouette of the
animal is witness to danger and extinction. The slaughtered head of
the rhinoceros cannot be thrown back without carrying the task of art
itself. As in the chorus of the ancient tragedy, the dull and demanding
roar of the animal vibrates, voice of that witness. In such voice, the
story of Amber Sena goes beyond the inhuman silence of death.
The notion of surface is also central in the work of the artist. On it,
the issues of time are engraved. The acrylic paint, polished, glazed,
vivid, protects the reflection of an opaque and detailed reality. Mirror
of depth, it is a film that has no thickness, but that only opens the
space of thought. And the Ark is not empty: in it, Sena’s maze of
cracks and scales, map of existences that risk being deleted, in the
hands of human will, slave of its own time, that acts according to the
sad logic of sale and commodity.
As regards the existence, never before it has been exposed to death
and destruction. Yet Sena’s accuracy and gestural density condense a
reflection about the indomitable proximity of the human to this dying
world. The animal, in fact, is a symbol of impotence, of inability to
communicate and insufficiency of words.
If originally the sense of community was based on sharing the
experience of the animal, sacrificed in the name of the higher
instance of the soul, now, today, the world seems to have given up
on such responsibility, insensitive in front of a complex and
problematic reality. For this reason, Sena’s space is an invitation to
approach, trail and hope for a more aware existence. That is what
we should answer for, to ourselves, to the others. And from such
trail we should start again
Works by Bruno Wapoth and Amber Sena
Two works by Bruno Walpoth
In the XIX century, Jacob Burckhardt was calling Bellini’s altarpieces
Existenzbilder, “pictures of existence”, and the first thing that stands
out when looking at the works of Bruno Walpoth is their pure and
sufficient “existence”. However, this strong presence is wrapped and
isolated by empty spaces, detached from any context and without
any attributes that qualify its identity.
They are figures of the absolute, carved in lime, apple or walnut
wood, in which elegance and solidity are features with which the
sculptor measures the harmony between naturalism and invention.
The agreement is between “no motion” gestures and the absence of
manifest feelings. The eyes of the molded figures stare at a distant
point and rarely meet those of the spectator. Since the eyes are
detectors of emotions, if the contact with the other is almost denied,
the statues become distant, absorbed in their existence, swallowed
up by their thoughts.
This monumental fixity has ancient origins, it takes us back to the
Roman statuary, also paying homage to the fifteenth-century
tradition, especially the manner of Piero della Francesca. Likewise,
the humanity that Bruno Walpoth examines and creates, diversified
in poses, colors and patterns, always represents the same “ideal
greatness” of those who, corroded by doubt, oscillate between the
search for the good and the attraction towards evil.
Rabbi Nachman of Bratislava said: “The world makes two mistakes:
the first one consists in thinking that a great man can do no wrong,
and the second one is believing that when a great man makes a
mistake he ceases to be great.”
Walpoth instills in his sculptures this complacent awareness of being
caged in the dilemma preceding the right action to take and therefore
they do not perform any action. Nevertheless, the ability of the
sculptor in calibrating the synthesis of bodies and his attention to
detail lead the viewer to capture and essentially transcend the
physical and material aspects, and any expressiveness or limb
movement is no longer needed to determine its meaning.
The thin irregular touches of white enrich the wood tissue preventing
immobility of light on volumes, while the shades of the hair or little
clothing enliven the figures with visual and tactile values, but without
affecting the solemn guise or that sense of magic and silence that
embody the art of Bruno Walpoth, being its wonderful constant
PLUS
A work by Amber Sena
It is as if the work of Amber Sena wanted to resist the temptation
of indifference that often characterizes the contemporary forms,
and where the issue of proximity, of urgency as regards to
instances precisely related to the environment and to the human,
emerges as an edge of the modern. The work of Sena deals with
one of the capital issues of our time, and not only in the name of
defense of animals. The artist focuses on the traces of a sense
that perhaps can snatch us from such indifference, stating the
responsibility of art, once again called to participate in a present
we should take charge of.
Nightwatch, the Chased into the Dark series, Nightingale represent
the enigma, and a question not asking for an answer. The size of the
work implies that narrative impose itself, beyond artistic classification,
as an unavoidable need to think about what one does not want to
see. We are both attracted and repelled, we curiously approach, and
the work stands before us in the form of a vision questioning the
human and the subjectivity. First and last issue.
The story is therefore tripartite. South Africa, at nightfall the moaning
of a wounded rhinoceros breaks the silence of plains. The cub, near the
body of a dying mother, sees his destiny fulfilled and added to a tragic
statistic. As a solitary mountain in the moonlight, the silhouette of the
animal is witness to danger and extinction. The slaughtered head of
the rhinoceros cannot be thrown back without carrying the task of art
itself. As in the chorus of the ancient tragedy, the dull and demanding
roar of the animal vibrates, voice of that witness. In such voice, the
story of Amber Sena goes beyond the inhuman silence of death.
The notion of surface is also central in the work of the artist. On it,
the issues of time are engraved. The acrylic paint, polished, glazed,
vivid, protects the reflection of an opaque and detailed reality. Mirror
of depth, it is a film that has no thickness, but that only opens the
space of thought. And the Ark is not empty: in it, Sena’s maze of
cracks and scales, map of existences that risk being deleted, in the
hands of human will, slave of its own time, that acts according to the
sad logic of sale and commodity.
As regards the existence, never before it has been exposed to death
and destruction. Yet Sena’s accuracy and gestural density condense a
reflection about the indomitable proximity of the human to this dying
world. The animal, in fact, is a symbol of impotence, of inability to
communicate and insufficiency of words.
If originally the sense of community was based on sharing the
experience of the animal, sacrificed in the name of the higher
instance of the soul, now, today, the world seems to have given up
on such responsibility, insensitive in front of a complex and
problematic reality. For this reason, Sena’s space is an invitation to
approach, trail and hope for a more aware existence. That is what
we should answer for, to ourselves, to the others. And from such
trail we should start again