gig london
muse-series-homage-to-Paul-Jaisini
“The truth comes out in argument of the opponents. Your article is not professional, has no history of art and thus no authority to judge the great invisibility per ce. You do have to study art and go through a tedious analysis to be able to antagonize this subject as you attempted. You do not bring to the fore any facts. Your outline is impoverished with poor vocabulary and absence of understanding of the subject. In your article I only could sense your personal subjective attitude. I can’t continue writing the critical review of your article as I am afraid you might not be able to afford it and honor the bill toward your account. Ellen Yustas K. Gottlieb”
— When you encounter someone enraged by what he/she had assumed is the invisible painting or invisible art, you probably would ask yourself, on what grounds the invisible art is being judged. Is it critiqued similarly to visible art, but how would it be logically possible. Or does it signify outright refusal to think more than denial requires. It is always easy to render negative opinion rather than trying to learn something new, perhaps… (via paul-jaisini-gleitzeit)
muse-series-homage-to-Paul-Jaisini
“The truth comes out in argument of the opponents. Your article is not professional, has no history of art and thus no authority to judge the great invisibility per ce. You do have to study art and go through a tedious analysis to be able to antagonize this subject as you attempted. You do not bring to the fore any facts. Your outline is impoverished with poor vocabulary and absence of understanding of the subject. In your article I only could sense your personal subjective attitude. I can’t continue writing the critical review of your article as I am afraid you might not be able to afford it and honor the bill toward your account. Ellen Yustas K. Gottlieb”
— When you encounter someone enraged by what he/she had assumed is the invisible painting or invisible art, you probably would ask yourself, on what grounds the invisible art is being judged. Is it critiqued similarly to visible art, but how would it be logically possible. Or does it signify outright refusal to think more than denial requires. It is always easy to render negative opinion rather than trying to learn something new, perhaps… (via paul-jaisini-gleitzeit)